The intellectual impoverishment of the party or the success of ruling in power for a long time!

The congresses of the Democratic Party and the Socialist Party, the holidays and the political "recreation", showed that the two main forces, but also the others around them, are intellectually impoverished and you lack intellectuals! Not just the PD which is an acute and irreparable folklorism already. But also PS! And of course with the largest party of Albanians the lack of intellectual and intellectualism in representation is the solution that an intellectual artist (Rama) has imposed on you to rule and extend power! Apparently there is no other way. In fact, there are many intellectuals like Gjiknuri, Spiropali, Balla, Ahmetaj, Krifca, Manastirlliu, why not Kumbaro, etc., etc., but of course you can not say that they are "full intellectuals". I have an idea that "the intelligent is for himself, and the intellectual for society" but maybe I am wrong! Maybe once (PD PS) both had intellectuals but ...!? But both PD and PS suffered from them! Hahaha, while writing I will probably be able to explain why they suffered from intellectualism! Vaclav Havel says: There is always something dubious about an intellectual who is on the side of the winners. He said that it did not seem intellectual to him anymore, or that it was used, or why it was transformed, this should be discussed, but in fact, it is the same with us! There are few, but those who are, are highly doubted whether they are and why they are intellectuals! Especially when the winners are permanent ... I mean, somewhat sarcastically! But I believe that politics has also gone to the saying of Franz Skull who says: Intellectual work separates man from the human community. Material work, on the other hand, leads man towards people. But in politics you need people, numbers, the political majority and the intellectual to ruin work in its corner and bubble often arrogant! The people (sovereign) are divided with the intellectuals. In many circumstances the people do not unite and only a revolution has brought the work to the point where they are together temporarily! Jean Paul Sartre has expressed this as a need in post-war France. He said: For 50 years the people and the intellectual have been divided. They must be one. The great man of letters had realized that the things that make the great movement, even the democratic one, were divided! They were living separately, they were not understood. Politically it has happened that mediocrity lined up and makes the majority. But it certainly does the majority that then creates violent opposition or political falsity, that kicks intellectuals everywhere in both politics and philosophy and science when the end of the discussion comes. Einstein angrily said: Great souls have always found the violent opposition of the mediocre, who do not know how to understand the man who does not accept inherited prejudices, but honestly and boldly uses his intelligence. The political or materialist taboos of the conservative and ignorant emerging business or the backward and retro cultural philosophy have always done so. Intellectuals do not need a political line-up and the dictatorship has nailed them, or censored them or killed them many times. Hitler has a saying of his which is: The strength of a political party does not consist in the great and autonomous intellectualism of individual members, but in a "disciplined obedience given by members to intellectual leadership." He knew himself intellectually and of course his leadership as well, and in this way the autonomous in mind would be killed or disbanded in the party. As for the "intellectuals" after him like Gering and Gebels or Himler they caused 60 million deaths! No other intellectuals were needed, and so did the Bolsheviks when they came to power. They no longer wanted autonomous intellectual thought in the presidency or in the party. So independent because you got out of line. They practically do not want it even today. Because it ruins your work. And this has been said by Charles Wright Mills: The political vocation of intellectuals lies in exposing the lies that support irresponsible power. "!? This is the task of the intellectual in politics! But who the hell loves this thing today not only in our Albania but also in ...!? Who loves this role in a political entity and government! And we are not so special in the time of artist Edi Rama, because Nietzsche said: In relations with scholars and artists, man easily errs in the opposite direction: behind a particular scholar often stands a mediocre human being, and behind an artist mediocre, often a very important human being. "We have been shot by a very important human being like Prime Minister Rama! Maybe as an artist he should appreciate the market or the size of today's art! great !! That says Berisha (who forgot his profession in contrast to Rama who does not forget) is a failure, maybe it should not be taken for granted! Maybe I say! ? There is a big problem with the artist and the intellectual in a single being! Francis Scott Fitzgerald says: Pay attention to the artist who is also intellectual: it is the artist who is redundant. Well yes, I mean that in this case the intellectual makes the artist superfluous or in excess !! Jokingly, or not jokingly, but so be it! We, the Prime Minister, have both artists and intellectuals, and these two then in his post and his party are a good and "dangerous" thing! When they collide with each other I have the "talk"! Perhaps it is enough to be an artist and his intellectual, to fill the gap created by the intentionality of intellectuals in the SP! Kushedi is his good pragmatic solution! There is no need to make the intellectuals in the party like a "pile of wood", because it rather solves problems with the mediocre model, but rational in enrichment demands for power and material. An intellectual risks a lot in this regard. Rama knows that he and his country are not western at this point. They are still oriental and not cheap. Yes, yes, and you are required to implement a democracy which is still not digestible by more than half the population. An intellectual like Rama knows this well. Most intellectuals would leave it in the mud and in the middle of the road and would not serve it. PS would lose and power would not be long. George Orwell says: Intellectual freedom is a deeply rooted tradition, without which our particularly Western culture is unlikely to exist. It is a tradition that many of our intellectuals are visibly turning their backs on. Orwell says, but already in Albania and why it started like that, stopped on the way and since 1997 no one in the party needs an intellectual and an intellectual himself, he no longer goes to a party because it is not a place for him. He can not be equated with the numerous "lumpen proletariat" in the DP and SP, nor with the ruling intellectuals above them, or the "intellectual" ruling elites in the DP and today the SP! Times change and transform, but small applications here and there are made by likening somewhere somewhere for bad and somewhere somewhere, for good. What is proven is that when the party becomes intellectually impoverished in its base and its being, it stays in power for a long time! Therefore ...?! He can not be equated with the numerous "lumpen proletariat" in the DP and SP, nor with the ruling intellectuals above them, or the "intellectual" ruling elites in the DP and today the SP! Times change and transform, but small applications here and there are made by likening somewhere somewhere for bad and somewhere somewhere, for good. What is proven is that when the party becomes intellectually impoverished in its base and its being, it stays in power for a long time! Therefore ...?! He can not be equated with the numerous "lumpen proletariat" in the DP and SP, nor with the ruling intellectuals above them, or the "intellectual" ruling elites in the DP and today the SP! Times change and transform, but small applications here and there are made by likening somewhere somewhere for bad and somewhere somewhere, for good. What is proven is that when the party becomes intellectually impoverished in its base and its being, it stays in power for a long time! Therefore ...?!