BREAKING NEWS

Berisha and his children with files in SPAK, the former prime minister, alarmed by the danger of investigations, denies the rumors and sends a message to prosecutors

Berisha and his children with files in SPAK, the former prime minister, alarmed
x
BREAKING NEWS

Bujar Çela: After Berisha, Meta will also be declared "non grata", their future is prison, time to give an account for the affairs where they are involved

Bujar Çela: After Berisha, Meta will also be declared "non
x
BREAKING NEWS

SPAK launches investigation for over 120 officials involved in scandals, waves of proceedings during 2021, corruption files are added in the hands of special forces

SPAK launches investigation for over 120 officials involved in scandals, waves
x
BREAKING NEWS

Izet Haxhia: I did not ambush Azem Hajdari, before he was killed he had a meeting with Sali Berisha

Izet Haxhia: I did not ambush Azem Hajdari, before he was killed he had a
x
BREAKING NEWS

Unexpected / Fifi makes the drastic decision, the residents do not restrain themselves, they burst into tears

Unexpected / Fifi makes the drastic decision, the residents do not restrain
x
BREAKING NEWS

Vaccination certificate suddenly expires

Vaccination certificate suddenly expires
x
BREAKING NEWS

The powerful storm will hit our country, learn how the weather will change tonight and what is expected to happen tomorrow (Follow everything LIVE)

The powerful storm will hit our country, learn how the weather will change
x
BREAKING NEWS

Blocks the opening of negotiations with the veto imposed on Northern Macedonia, Bulgaria makes an OFFICIAL request, here is what is said about Albania

Blocks the opening of negotiations with the veto imposed on Northern Macedonia,
x

Opinion / Editorial

Mao Zedong's "Chinese Socialism" serves as a mask to mask China's imperialist path

Mao Zedong's "Chinese Socialism" serves as a mask to mask

Of course a lot has been written about Mao's China and continues to be written ... and will be written again, because its history is complex and extensive. The Chinese revolution led by Mao Zedong and his victory in October 1949 opened a new era for this country with an ancient history and equally ancient civilization, but which all the time had experienced double, internal slavery. of its emperors and mandarins, as well as the colonial one, and of course Mao's statement at the time that për "for us it was a great victory that we went from misery to poverty" had a real basis. Although Mao admired Marx and Marxism as well as Lenin's revolutionary path, under the guise of "creative development of Marxism" or "concrete conditions and special specifics of countries and regions" he (Mao) gradually moved on the path of reformism. Of course, Marxism is not and should not be a dogma, just as the paths through which the socialist revolution passes are diverse in accordance with the specifics of each country, but also with the situations that characterize the era in which we live. It was at this point that Mao had major fluctuations and the reformist and anti-Marxist path of Mao. "Maocedun- idea" and the theory of "Three Worlds" has analyzed with a brilliant critique on the basis of social sciences Enver Hoxha in two large volumes "Notes on China" and in the book "Imperialism and Revolution", This is a critique based on science because the theory of the "Three Worlds" is a denial of Marxism-Leninism and consequently of proletarian revolutions and socialism. The truth is that in the age we live in, the whole globe is experiencing two worlds: On the one hand the capitalist and imperialist oppressors and exploiters with all their apparatus and structures, which keep it afloat, and on the other the oppressed peoples of exploited of any continent or region, nation, nationality, race and color. The Chinese artificially use the term "third world", which they propagate and claim to be their protectors and representatives, to define precisely those poor colonial or semi-colonial countries that suffer and experience not only great economic and cultural backwardness, but and exploited barbarically. in some Latin American countries as far as the Middle East it has turned him into an imperialist superpower that some uneducated calligraphers present to us as a "specific Chinese socialism" (like Tito's specific socialism or as he is known by the term "Samopravlenie" - self-administration). So at this point China's socialism only has such a term, because China's hegemony has already become a visible reality and Mao's plan to make China a superpower became a reality. If China were to really become a socialist superpower it would surely be a good example for the whole globe where the peoples of this globe must rise up in the proletarian revolution, to eradicate once and for all the human barbarism realized through the exploitation it has capitalism. Does the existence and existence of a single party in the leadership of the state and moreover the statement that "it is communist" mean that it is so ?! Even world imperialism and other capitalist countries declare that the classical and barbaric capitalism that used it to the core with 12 to 16 hours of labor no longer exists. Yes. And this is true, but the restriction and reduction of working hours, the right to wages and pensions, the right to one to two days off per week are not concessions from capitalist benevolence nor from its "humanism", but are efforts of the proletariat of these countries. This "loss of working hours" today in modern times the capitalist compensates with the development and introduction of new technology in production, which means that for a certain unit of time, produces how many times more than at the time when the worker worked from 12 to 16 hours. Tito's Yugoslavia also spoke of socialism, but Eduard Kardel's "Yugoslav self-government" only enriched party and state leaders, high-ranking directors and officials, who created privileges for themselves by carrying the communist trick in their pockets, thus creating the bed. the warmth of the new capitalists who would come from the degenerating socialism. The same thing happened after Stalin's death, the Khrushchev clique and the Brezhnev clique to Gorbachev, who came one after the other, disguised their political and economic "capitalism" with communist slogans. The fact that not only B. Soviet and Yugoslavia, Poland etc. passed to the capitalist system with "peaceful counter-revolution" is an undeniable indicator, that when the economic basis of socialism degenerates, it automatically shifts to capitalism. At the same time, and by the opposite analogy, the so-called "socialism" of the Netherlands, which is trumpeted by some as socialism, is not at all such because the economic basis of these systems is "private property over the means of production." What is special about these countries is the fact that the ratio of workers' wages is somewhat higher, thanks to the geographical position that favors them, their reserves that nature has forgiven them are to the extent that oppression and exploitation is relatively easier. than in some other European countries. So China is entirely on the capitalist path of material production and distribution. Its competition with other superpowers is not at all to demonstrate which socio-economic order has the upper hand, "Chinese-type masked socialism" or American, European, Russian, English or Japanese imperialism? Jo! China with communist masks completely immersed in material production with private enterprises and corporations, but controlled by the Communist Party which being in the direction (plays the role of the state) has fully established the state capitalist relations not only in the domestic plan, but also that external. Chinese products are already spread not only in neighboring countries and the Asian Region and East and Southeast Asia, but also completely in Africa and even to Europe. Hundreds of thousands of Chinese companies already operate around the globe even though Zi-Zhepingu declares that he will not know if there is democracy, dictatorship, or autocracy in these countries ... - for me - he says it is enough not to criticize our way of governance and direction. China has chosen Africa to establish its hegemony because the black continent has large reserves of raw materials that the Chinese capitalist economy needs and not without purpose it has invested there almost 1/3 of the total value for investments abroad and not only to take raw materials from Africa by going there under the guise of "development", but also because the labor force of black Africans is bought cheaply by China's yellow capitalists, who are just as cruel in working conditions as the capitalists old Europe. This would be stated by the former Minister of Agriculture of Zambia, Guy Scott, in the newspaper "The Guardian", who states: "We already say that we have seen a lot of bad people. "White users were and are bad, Indians are just as bad, but the Chinese are the worst of them all." (It is about the executives of firms, enterprises, companies and capitalist corporations). China has stated that its main enemy is America. This was once stated by Khrushchev, but her statement is not from the position of defining the US as the international gendarme of the peoples of the world of freedom, independence and sovereignty of countries, but a statement of an imperialist superpower, which is characterized by dissatisfaction in the division and redistribution of the world statement that opposes another superpower. Currently when China has become the second economic-military superpower, after the USA, it is logical that both of these are in competition with each other and this feature is one of the essential elements typical of imperialism, as well as European and Russian imperialism. The emergence of imperialist China in the international arena as a superpower, its influence in Africa, Southeast Asia and even Latin America upsets the balances of markets and spheres of influence so it is necessarily in the nature of imperialism to revise them by increasing the risk of a third world war. The secret agreement between the USA-England and Australia in Gambera (behind the back of France) in the field of military deliveries mainly in ships and submarines with missiles or nuclear refueling, in the interest of Australia, amounting to $ 59 billion; it has to do not only with the threat but also with limiting China in that region. Will China stand idly by or will the other superpowers be indifferent? By no means! Imperialist China, although removed as "uncommitted" or disguised as "communist", like Russia of the new tsars as well as Europe or as it is known by the term old continent (for us Albanians old whores) and England which has emerged as a separate superpower , in situations when economic policy can not find a solution, prepare to throw the balls. This is an extremely threatening warning situation, an alarm bell that a new bloodshed is being prepared for the peoples and that the black clouds of World War III are approaching. The peoples of the world will allow themselves to become cannon fodder for the benefit of those who oppress and exploit them, or will they know how to stop the belligerent hand of any imperialism and if war breaks out does imperialism know that this will eventually mark its end? Because this war will unquestionably bring about the proletarian revolution which is the locomotive of history and at the same time for the first time the globe the day after the victory would dawn free and without a system of slavery.