The people do not allow unnecessary conflicts to arise between politicians and rulers

The circumstance that naturally greatly complicates the dialogue is the lack of social culture, without which even democracy cannot function, as a fundamental value in the multi-party pluralist system. As if both parties have fallen prey to all this and have also fallen prey to intellectual apathy, or the lack of it. The generator of conflicts, or conflict in this case, are crises in many identity questions. Of course, when there is a common will and when all values ??are embraced, the desired goal is reached, to form new bodies of executive power. The same is happening in Kosovo and North Macedonia, where a possible and comprehensive social dialogue, where many topics would be addressed, but also the topic of identity. Such marked political polarizations have prevented dialogue even then, when the question is state interest and national interest. When we don't want to understand each other, in delicate situations, then what the hell are we here for under this sky. Everyone would be good, you look at your own actions, and the actions of the people around us, to better determine the mission we have, not only what we emphasized several times. We think that the political forces in power should define the state-power duality, in accordance with the constitutional laws. Democracy should not produce unnecessary conflicts between politicians, rulers and parties, but with the defining vision to design new strategies for alleviating poverty, for the unemployment curve to decrease, we want to have electricity and water for every day, to have as much less swearing in parliament and more income for the poor, justice for all, there should be no murders, suicides, tritoli krismas, threats, rapes or abuses, and political convictions should not be used for narrow personal interests, as has happened and happens regularly. Each of us has a part of the blame to honor the heroes of the nation equally, to have an intensified economy, as much cultivated land as possible, green forests, cultivated fields, clean rivers and a cross Albania as the renaissanceists called it . And the sovereign expects and expects not only the deep reform in the justice system, but the entire legislative and governing dome. In democratic systems, certain social groups, mainly political ones, the programs that unfold in the electoral elections, determine the positive changes of the electorate, and they certainly believe unequivocally that the campaigns take place in the positive direction of the welfare of the sovereign, to be a civilized society if yes, but especially at the economic levels of Europe, where we aim to reach. But such thoughts, as we judge, harm the Albanian issue in general and the Albanians of Kosovo and North Macedonia, in particular. The Albanian Balkan spaces remain configured within a bitter geographical and historical reality, since not only did the Albanians remain living in six states. In the Balkans, there are no big and small, with the new changes and realignments, in our peninsula, slowly everyone will understand that there are no bigger people, everyone is equal. We Albanians have not yet formed as a nation in the full sense of the word.