Heavy in Korça! The 27-year-old is found dead on Mount Morava, the first suspicions
16 officials are declared 'non-women' by the USA, Antony Blinken comes out with a strong warning: We will break the ties of ...
Escobar comes to Tirana tomorrow, Spartak Ngjela reveals what will happen tomorrow: Saliu will go ...
Yuri Kim gives new details about the US strategic plan to fight corruption: By executive order of Biden ...
US makes the next blow, puts 2 more people on the 'black list', it becomes clear what they are accused of (NAMES)
"They are both endangered by American politics", Spartak Ngjela speaks by name and warns of the 'scary' end for these 2 Albanian politicians: This is a fact!
The Ministry of Health officializes the latest Covid data: Over 5000 active patients in the country, here are how many have been infected in the last 24 hours
"To stop the corrupt from acting with impunity" / What is he warning? Ambassador Yuri Kim delivers the important message
Police statement in the series: The perpetrator at the scene under house arrest!
Written by Bardhyl BEJKO 19 Tetor 2021
It has almost become standard, almost with mathematical accuracy, that whenever there is talk of a crime scene, a serious crime, attempted robbery, murder, beating, wounding, it is evident that in this crime one of the persons involved in the conflict resulted in communications as an individual. with criminal record. At the end of the police communiqué, the phrase is stated: He was "under house arrest". The delinquent contingent is known to be in most cases recurring, filed and identified by the police. Not a few of them are citizens who unfortunately every time they get out of the cell are recycled in the course of criminal events, committing other punishable offenses. In these three decades, we have known hundreds of such cases. They are flagrant because even though the individual is convicted of a serious crime, he after gaining freedom, not a few cases with procedure, has been released and the same person is re-entered into the crime cycle. Sometimes as protagonists, sometimes as supporters and in many cases as the main person who takes the lead role of a criminal group accused of murder, assassination or armed robbery. Most of these individuals are known for serious crimes such as murder or attempted murder committed fully consciously, not to mention the contingent that commits such custom acts that are commonly labeled "paid killers". If you were referring to the black chronicle, which is daily and in many cases occupies the front of the press and the first news on television screens, you are familiar with dozens of such cases that extend to the geography of the entire territory of Albania. That there will be such events, this can not be discussed because in our society as in all other societies in the state even with sophisticated police such events can not be zeroed. This did not make us as the country of origin of the crime. Such phenomena is the obligation of law enforcement agencies to be minimized and prevented. What impresses you the most and irritates the psyche and civic conscience, is a very significant and serious fact that should hold responsible and even legally responsible persons and structures. Surprisingly, in all the most exposed groups, one or two or three persons participating in criminal acts, is an individual who at the time when he is a co-perpetrator in a crime, is under the measure given by the court "house arrest". Persons with criminal records and social danger, predisposed to commit serious acts to the detriment of society and the lives of individuals, not in vain are punished with "house arrest". It is the judgment and decision of the courts that give this verdict and here we do not question whether it is a right or wrong decision. Whether such measures should be given or acted differently, escalating the measures to imprisonment in the cell, where they are serving a sentence until appearing before the court, most of the perpetrators involved in serious crimes or any other type. What we want to emphasize is that exactly, this contingent is not supervised and it is not controlled whether it is under house arrest or breaks this security measure, leaving the house and going out in the city centers or taking vacations as a free man. The measure "house arrest" presupposes a lighter measure than imprisonment, but ultimately, is a sentencing measure until the court panel announces the final decision. A person under house arrest must be supervised by law enforcement agencies, who must check every minute whether the convict with this measure implements the court decision or breaks them and comes out as if he were a free citizen who has all the rights granted by the Constitution at a time when he is deprived of these rights after the acts and criminal offenses he has consumed. The measures against him are given by the court and are implemented or must be implemented by the police through the services near the apartment where the convict under house arrest is located. This is written and should be applied to anyone who is suffering such a measure and checked not to slip and break the decision, pretending not to be restrictive, yes a man who had the right to move freely and worse to be recycled into serious criminal offenses. House arrest measures in our justice system are also given to dangerous criminals. Even in cases where it was certain that they would escape to escape the law. As was the case with the Turkish trafficker, who was left under house arrest without any address and he fled in an unsuspecting direction. In recent days, in official police communications, as was the case at the former old bus park station, two citizens were injured, who were stopped by the police and within a short time the two assassins were detained, where it resulted that one of them had a criminal record under house arrest. Also in the Lezha event, one of the participants in the assassination attempt on the police officer was under house arrest. These are not the only cases where an individual under house arrest is involved in assassinations or serious criminal offenses. Such examples, as well as the cases when persons with protection orders, remain discovered and fall victim to those from whom the police must protect. The measure of house arrest is a measure that is not rarely applied, on the contrary, it is a tendency in most of those who are sentenced to imprisonment, where the defense makes every effort to facilitate the measure. Surprisingly and unfortunately, those who benefit from this easy measure of isolation until they receive a sentence or innocence from the competent authorities, the prosecution and the courts, stay at home. What if the court decision is house arrest, then how should this measure be supervised if implemented by the convict and how should its implementation be controlled? According to the courts and the prosecution, the police have a duty to control the implementation of the law. How much is such surveillance implemented and how many should be kept under house arrest? That for those whose sentence of imprisonment is imprisonment, there are special structures and their supervision is possible as they are in prison facilities, security is high and control possible. Those under house arrest appear to be unattended, likely to come out whenever they need to or commit serious acts, becoming part of acts that undermine security and damage property or endanger the lives of innocent citizens. In this sense, this measure to date results in many problems and is not effective. As long as the Criminal Code presupposes such a sentence, then it must be accompanied by extraordinary measures, regardless of the costs and the number of police officers to be mobilized to ensure uncompromising house arrest. After all, every detainee demands freedom. No one would want to stay in isolation even though they have committed a crime or been involved in wrongdoing. In these conditions, it is intolerable for an individual with a security measure, house arrest who have no right to move freely, to open the door of the house, to get in the car, to go out for shopping or for coffee when in reality he should to stay at home. It is known that the apartment in this case plays the role of a detention cell. Even the cells are guarded twenty-four hours by the prison police troops and whoever tolerates and makes concessions is punished by the justice authorities. He is under the same status under house arrest. If the police release him and do not supervise the implementation of the decision, then it happens as to this day that even with house arrest and free to go to weddings or parties in the city or family visits. It is this lack that in many cases leads to the recycling of persons with criminal records in various crimes. And police communiqués will quote the same as in these three decades: Police confirm that in the serious event that occurred on…, which involved three people, two of whom with criminal records who have been convicted or participated in the event severe, one of them was under house arrest! Running away from the home of those who must enforce the court decision is not the sole responsibility of individuals suffering this measure of isolation, yes first of the competent bodies, which bear responsibility when an arrested, sentenced to house arrest returns to criminal activity. Whose responsibility is in these cases? Individuals who break the security measure and commit serious acts will, of course, be punished. What about law enforcement bodies, are not they complicit and should not be punished for lack of control and non-implementation of court decisions? If they did their job, then no one would have the courage to get out of house arrest and get involved in crime. This tolerance is more than the crime itself! are they not accomplices and should they not be punished for lack of control and non-enforcement of the court decision? If they did their job, then no one would have the courage to get out of house arrest and get involved in crime. This tolerance is more than the crime itself! are they not accomplices and should they not be punished for lack of control and non-enforcement of the court decision? If they did their job, then no one would have the courage to get out of house arrest and get involved in crime. This tolerance is more than the crime itself!