Letter without an envelope to the wasteful anti-historian!

You unscrupulous deformer, who removes an analyst "by saying" someone told you, someone told you, and on the basis of these, you, assuming the role of a historical review analyst, come to conclusions that and why you are removed as "anti-Yugoslav" completely fits their thesis that you said that you were at the Party school, that is to say that you probably studied historical and dialectical materialism there, which in fact, in my opinion, you did not understand anything from that school. Up to this point, I have written general words... Let's start with the analysis: The question arises, why did you not understand anything from philosophy?.. Here's why: Historical events and phenomena are not random, but neither are they random. of the individual voluntarism of 3-4 people (in the specific case of the Yugoslav envoys who you guess that they supposedly formed our NPSH), but they are and arise in certain periods and situations as an objective necessity. It is known that the theses of the "Committee" were introduced in Albania by Ali Kelmendi as early as 1936, just as it is known that there were communist groups even before the formation of the NPSH, regardless of whether they were really on the tracks of the ML or not, this is another issue (it blows my mind that you don't know that since the time of A. Zogu, communists have been punished). So, the terrain and the objective conditions were ripe and all that was needed was the initiative to unite these groups. Eee..what do you say, "Analyst" of dubious annals, the logical question arises that if these groups did not exist, would the NPSH have been formed on November 8, 1941? Of course not, because there was a lack of theoretical thinking. This means from a materialist point of view that the objective conditions existed for the formation of the NPSH, whether Titua wanted it or not... whether Dimitrov wanted it or not (who was the chairman of the Committee) that time). Why did the Yugoslavs come exactly at those moments? This also has its own explanation: firstly, our communists at that time had shortcomings not only in matters of organization, but also disagreements with each other, that is, not only to help in the procedures of the meetings in the way of the elections of the leadership forum, in the way of defining the tasks for each member of the leadership, etc., but also being a third party, understanding between them would be easier. So far, there is nothing wrong, because I can give valuable advice on how to organize the party to any communist, be it here or in any other country. But what is the main thing that you don't show?! The main thing is that you don't talk about those matches that the NPSH had, since its formation until 1948, this year, which marks the final separation with the Communist League of Yugoslavia. First of all, the truth is that we trusted Tito's envoys (like I trusted you and how did I know that in wartime you would be the first to desert?!) and we did not do wrong, but the NPSH maintained its vigilance, so all the interventions from the Berat plenum and later are clear indicators of the matches between our right principles and the opportunistic and deviant concepts of the titists. The fact of the strict and rigorous positions of the KPSH, such as the economic agreement and currency exchange, the removal of customs, or the strict opposition that the Yugoslav division should not enter Albania at all (allegedly to protect us from the intervention of Greece), the interventions theirs in the destruction and disruption of the unity of the leadership with K. Xoxen, N. Spiron, etc., are principled positions, especially the letter of the KQPKSH to Stalin on the wrong theses and the intervention of the LKJ in the internal affairs of the NPSH. This is the truth, commissar, you betrayed COMMANDER ENVER to the greatest surprise. (Don't be the first traitor...! ) In your speech you say that Albania did not align with the Allies and even insinuates that the great Allies had no idea at all whether Albania was fighting or not? You are a complete ignoramus with a lack of knowledge of history. To be frank, anyone in certain fields may not have knowledge, but if I, for example, dare to enter into a debate on a certain issue, I would study in advance. Why do I say this? Because you are so ignorant that you have no idea at all that the Foreign Ministers of America, England and the USSR in December 1942 announced to the world through their notes that they recognized the righteous struggle of the Albanian people against Nazi-fascism and its succession next to great allies, which means that our people walked the path of honor and not like you talk like an unprepared student and come to comments without doing their homework... at least not like an honest citizen. I say this to remember and to never forget that we had English missions not only attached to our formations but also to the ballistic-zogists, as you should learn that at the end of the war, they were added to us and American and Soviet missions that you don't even know if there were or not, or you maliciously don't mention them (so, "analyst" "hypocrite commissioner", in some cases when it is necessary, you should think more than the stomach). In another thesis, you throw out the idea that we were liberated on November 28, 1944. The truth is that it could be this date, it could be the 26th, it could be the 30th, why not maybe the beginning of December... but Your greenhouse would never accept dt. "November 29, 1944" and this is no coincidence. You do this deliberately to stage the alleged "servility of the NPSH towards the Communist League of Yugoslavia (or LKJ for short). You don't know that we announced it on the national liberation day as early as November 29, 1944... while the Yugoslavs have November 29, 1945 (that is, a year later than us) and strangely enough, why don't you accuse the Yugoslavs that they coincided with our holiday, but accuse us?!).And to find out, you "prodigal commissar" we not only got rid of money their, and with our own strength, but we also helped our brother peoples and we have not made a mistake at all, but we have done such a great act to be respected by the whole progressive and anti-fascist world. So in this case, your insinuation is refuted by the objective reality, which means that this is not true either, that we supposedly adapt our party to Yugoslavia. You have to learn, the scavenger of systems, that in the documents and archives not only of the Albanians, but also of the Nazi hierarchs who left Shkodra, the date 29 November 1944 is marked. (Refer to the documents if you know any foreign language.. What foreign language do you know? when you don't even know how to speak your own language, Albanian?!) You, to "convince" us, take a quote from the teacher of the Party school that you had great faith in they said that we (Albania) were not liberated on dt. 29..November, but on 28. Here we believe it....but how do I know that this is not a deliberate slander on your part? (I say this because if I ask you for his name, you will of course tell me to be trusted... but on the other hand, you will also tell me that he... is no longer alive.) I don't believe this at all, it's even an invention, why not a slander of yours in order that you don't have this "medemek" data from yourself, but from a lecturer, not even a lecturer at all, but from the Party School. Monstrous slander from a poisoned tongue because in a conversation between two people when one of them is no longer alive /..you shouldn't have said it yourself because that way you inadvertently testify to the opposite of what you say. Below in your speech, you say that being a passionate person who has spent all his time towards the truth... you have come across many partisans who have not killed any German during the war. Again insidious with a poisonous tongue! You don't say this without purpose, because it is known that there may have been full partisans who may not have killed any Italian or German fascists, and for me this may be truly believable as you say. which means that there may have been complete such. Strangely, you say that we had partisans who did not kill fascists, but you state that they did not kill us with ballistic missiles. With this you deliberately and with a heart of malice will channel our glorious NA-CL war as a fratricidal war. You are very bitter, ex.. ex.. ex-commissioner, how the flag has fallen! I am not surprised that there are and still are people like you, but to have been a commissar in an important department of our people's army and to speak this language is not allowed, at least for Albanian manhood. Why ? Because at the time of "Uncle" you were not a hypocrite of the system, but first and foremost the biggest hypocrite with yourself. I want to know from you, have you ever raised your voice about any injustice that you saw at that time in the APS line during the time you served in the ranks of the People's Army? I call you a coward and an incomparable hypocrite, and I say it with the greatest sincerity, I would honor a brave enemy to face me face to face, why can't I respect those who we once had against, but in character they were manly, they preferred to be punished..but they don't lose their manhood.. Where were you when they came out against you? I will tell you the real position where you have been... and by bringing your discussion against a person who made a serious mistake, perhaps unintentionally, you will say: "This man who opposes socialism, the teachings of the Party and Comrade Enver , this man who steps on the magnificent act and the blood of our martyrs who has thrown mud on our glorious National Liberation War, actually throws mud on our beloved Albania... THEREFORE I PROPOSAL THAT FOR HIM... THE SWORD OF THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE PROLETARIAT WILL MAKE YOU FORCE" ... This was your portrait or ex.. ex.. ex o te rente flama" ex commissar".